Five public-review subjects
Choose one part of the Standard to understand, test, and improve.
You do not need to read the full repository. Each subject page explains the proposal in plain language, offers a focused pressure test, shows the formal draft, and carries your question into a website feedback form.
Find my review pathPublic-review draft
Responsible AI Infrastructure
Tests whether energy, water, land, grid capacity, data practices, labor conditions, and community effects are visible before an infrastructure claim is treated as responsible.
Start with: Which impact should be measured before a pilot begins, and what result should make it pause?
Public-review compact
Campus AI Governance
Tests whether campus AI preserves authorship and learning, protects student data, limits surveillance, respects workers, explains consequential uses, and gives affected people a real governance role.
Start with: Which campus AI use most needs a clearer right, rule, notice, or appeal path?
Public-review clause
AI Benefit Sharing
Tests whether claimed gains are measured against a credible baseline, preserve rights and service quality, give affected people decision authority, route a defined benefit, and leave a public receipt.
Start with: What evidence and decision right would make a benefit claim genuinely reviewable?
Public-review guide
Reviewer Questions
Helps students, workers, communities, rights advocates, agencies, foundations, and institutional reviewers choose one grounded perspective and turn it into a specific critique.
Start with: What is the first change that would make one part of the draft more credible?
Public-review checklist
Anti-Capture Risks
Tests whether an interested actor could control governance, data, evidence, benefits, reviewers, or public claims and receive the appearance of legitimacy without enforceable safeguards.
Start with: Which safeguard is easiest to weaken, and what would make it enforceable?
Source record and boundaries
The website is the review front door. GitHub remains the public source record.
These are working drafts, not final standards, certification criteria, adoption claims, confidential materials, or evidence of endorsement. Reviewers can use the website without a GitHub account.
Open the public source record