Common Ground Standard

Enter the draft through the question you know best.

Choose who you are reviewing for, what you need to test, and how much time you have. Leave with one section, one prompt, and one clear contribution path.

Start your review path Browse the drafts

Public review only. No endorsement, certification, confidential access, or sign-on.

01 Perspective Student or campus reviewer
02 Pressure test Reputation-cover or capture risk
03 Time 10 minutes
Campus anti-capture review

Choose your path

Route your review into a useful contribution.

The best feedback is specific: a capture risk, evidence threshold, no-go condition, missing safeguard, or wording improvement that can strengthen the v0.2 draft.

Reviewer role
Critique focus
Time available

Open review tasks

Start where critique is already needed.

These public GitHub issues show the current source-record agenda. They are optional: use the website review form above when you do not have or do not want to use a GitHub account.

Evidence Minimum evidence before any alignment claim Anti-capture Separate review, endorsement, alignment, and certification Ecology Clarify ecological restoration triggers Public receipts Define public receipt requirements Benefit sharing Prevent benefits from covering replacement harm Campus compact Strengthen student data model-training prohibition Infrastructure Clarify water and grid no-go conditions

What happens next

Feedback becomes review material, not endorsement language.

  1. Feedback is triaged by standard area, risk type, and v0.2 relevance.
  2. Useful critique may become a wording change, no-go term, evidence requirement, deferred question, or risk-register item.
  3. Review participation does not create endorsement, partnership, certification, or public approval.